Crypto Payment Integration Selector
Answer 12 questions to find the OxaPay integration method that best fits your business, platform, checkout, automation needs, branding, technical resources, and launch plan. The tool compares practical options instead of treating one method as best for every business.
Choose the simplest method that meets your real payment needs
More customization is not always better. Payment Links work well for manual sales. A plugin is often the easiest choice for a supported store. Static Address fits reusable deposits, while White Label is suitable only when your team can manage the full payment experience.
No API key, login, or customer data is needed. Your answers stay in this browser.
How all seven methods scored
Scores show relative fit for the answers you entered. A method can receive a lower maximum score when a key requirement is missing.
| Integration route | Fit | Status | Best reason | Main limitation |
|---|
First five setup steps
Items to resolve before live payments
What each OxaPay method is designed for
Check the linked official page for current features, availability, and implementation details. Webhooks support API-based methods; they are not a separate integration method.
لینک پرداخت
Share a hosted payment request without building a checkout.
خدمات اهدایی
Use a reusable donation link or button for fundraising and community support.
Pre-built Plugin
Add crypto payments to a supported platform with less custom development.
Merchant Invoice API
Create a new hosted invoice for each order and connect it to your system.
White Label API
Build a fully branded payment page while OxaPay provides payment details.
API آدرس استاتیک
Give a customer or account a reusable address for deposits or repeat payments.
Custom API Integration
Combine OxaPay services for complex platforms or several payment flows.
How the selector compares integration methods
The tool compares each method using your business model, payment pattern, platform, technical resources, branding, automation, system connection, webhook needs, reusable-address needs, volume, and launch timeline.
It also applies practical limits. For example, a plugin cannot rank as ready for live use when the platform is unsupported. White Label and Custom API receive a lower maximum score without backend resources. Static Address is limited when a reusable address is not needed. This prevents a few matching preferences from hiding a major implementation gap.
Questions about choosing an integration method
Does the highest score always mean the method is best?
No. The score is a planning recommendation for the use case you entered. Confirm current product availability, pricing, platform support, security, and operational readiness before launch.
Why can a simpler method rank above a custom API?
A custom API offers more control, but it also adds development, monitoring, webhook, reconciliation, and support work. The selector prefers the simplest method that still meets your requirements.
Does recurring billing automatically require Static Address?
No. Your system still needs to manage renewal dates, customer access, price changes, reminders, and failed payments. Static Address is mainly useful for reusable deposits, not every subscription model.
When should I choose White Label instead of Merchant Invoice?
Choose White Label when you need full control of the payment page and have a team that can manage payment statuses, expiry, errors, support, security, and recovery. Merchant Invoice is usually easier to operate.
Can this tool confirm whether my platform has a supported plugin?
No. Plugin availability and supported versions can change. Check the official OxaPay plugin page before relying on the recommendation.
Check the recommendation before accepting live payments
Confirm the selected method, current pricing, platform support, credentials, payment statuses, webhook behavior, settlement settings, and team responsibilities before launch.