Wallet Incident

Overview

Examples include seed exposure, malicious signing, unauthorized approval, lost access, compromised interfaces, faulty transaction construction, smart-account module abuse, recovery failure, address substitution, and incorrect network selection. Consequences may span multiple assets, chains, accounts, and counterparties.

An anomalous transaction is not always proof of key compromise, while a compromised key may remain unused. Responders must identify wallet type, authority model, affected credentials, transaction state, asset reachability, linked approvals, and whether containment actions themselves reveal or destroy recovery options.

Plans should cover evidence preservation, device isolation, revocation, allowance cancellation, asset migration, counterparty contact, monitoring, and communications. Recovery must use verified software and addresses, rotate all related authority, reconcile transactions, test restored access, and document remaining exposure.

The wallet and custody workflow for Wallet Incident should locate where evidence enters, where a rule or judgment is applied, what state changes, and which downstream service relies on the result.

A wallet incident is an event that compromises or disrupts wallet keys, permissions, transactions, privacy, availability, recovery, or expected security behavior. Wallet Incident must define the affected service or asset, event severity, business and customer impact, evidence, responsible roles, containment priority, recovery objective, and reporting obligations. Effective handling of Wallet Incident connects detection, triage, preservation, containment, eradication, recovery, communication, regulatory assessment, and lessons learned through one auditable timeline. Wallet incident response requires authority mapping, careful containment, safe asset migration, evidence preservation, approval revocation, reconciliation, and verified recovery.

A production treatment of Wallet Incident should test an event that compromises or disrupts wallet keys, permissions, transactions, privacy, availability, recovery, or expected security behavior within the relevant asset, decision, or service state. The Wallet Incident context record for event that compromises, disrupts wallet keys, and permissions should preserve source data, configuration or policy version, responsible actor, exception, and outcome. Review of Wallet Incident should determine whether safeguards addressing event that compromises, disrupts wallet keys, and permissions changed exposure in practice, not merely whether a document or setting existed.