Token Migration

Overview

Token migration is the conversion or replacement of an existing token with a new contract, network, denomination, ticker, standard, or protocol representation.

Migration can use swap contracts, issuer snapshots, exchange-managed conversion, burn-and-mint, bridge movement, claims, or automatic native upgrades. the lifecycle can include issuance, distribution, approvals, transfers, locking, burning, redemption, migration, and governance. Not every token supports each stage, and some functions are controlled by privileged roles.

The old token can remain transferable after support ends, and one exchange or wallet can migrate automatically while another requires user action. Tokens that appear economically similar can differ in transfer restrictions, backing, governance, upgrade authority, fee behavior, and redemption. For Token Migration, those differences matter for custody, payments, and accounting.

Risks include phishing contracts, missed deadlines, wrong source network, unequal conversion, duplicate accounting, lost approvals, unsupported legacy deposits, and reduced liquidity. Risks include counterfeit contracts, compromised issuer or administrator keys, unexpected minting, transfer restrictions, smart-contract bugs, wrong-network deposits, approval theft, bridge failure, liquidity loss, and misleading claims about utility or backing.

Systems should preserve old and new identifiers, conversion ratio, source and destination, deadline, transaction, exchange treatment, tax record, and deprecation policy. Before enabling Token Migration, test deposits, payouts, refunds, approvals, and failure cases with the current contract version. incident procedures should cover pauses, migrations, delistings, and loss of a conversion or redemption route.

Token Migration, Network Migration, and Token may appear in the same workflow. Every component connected to Token Migration should therefore be validated independently so a related asset or mechanism is not credited as the intended token.